Brandish an over-the-top arsenal, from the devestating boom of the quadruple-barreled Fournicator to the feathered chaos of the Pigeon Mine!.aggressive playstyle! Plenty of new tools to support your (mostly) peaceful confrontations, but violence is still always an option too!
Approach your errands in a non-linear fashion within total free roam, open world, sandbox gameplay! Seek out optional side quests for additional rewards! Or ignore all of that and just cause general pandemonium at your own leisure in the town of Edensin!.POSTAL 4: No Regerts is a satirical and outrageous comedic open world first person shooter and the long-awaited true sequel to what’s been fondly dubbed as "The Worst Game Ever™", POSTAL 2! (No third game is known to exist.) What untold prospects lie within? Fame? Fortune? Maybe a bidet or two? Edensin awaits. However, on the horizon, the duo glimpses an unfamiliar and dazzling town that beckons to them. After a fortuitous gas station rest stop ends with their car, trailer home, and the rest of their worldly possessions stolen, all the Dude’s seemingly got left to his name is his canine cohort and his bathrobe, and neither of them smells all that great.
The only two to walk away from the cataclysm unscathed, the hapless everyman known as the POSTAL Dude and his loyal companion Champ, drive aimlessly through the scorching deserts of Arizona looking for a new place to call home. The forum has also ordered the insurance firm of the postal department to give Rs 5,000 towards mental agony and Rs 5,000 towards litigation expenses to the complainant.Several years have passed since the events that devastated the once proud town remembered as Paradise. The consumer forum has directed the postal department to return the invested money with eight per cent interest. So the postal department is responsible to return the invested money,” Pandya added. But in this case, they didn’t verify the signatures that were forged by the accused. Also, before releasing the money, the postal officials have to verify the signatures of the investors. “But we argued that the agents, who committed the fraud, were approved by the government. So, the postal department said that it is not their responsibility,” said Montu Pandya of Vadodara Grahak Suraksha Mandal, a co-complainant in the case. This helped the accused in forging signatures of the complainants and withdrawing all the money outside their knowledge. “The postal department argued that the complainants showed blind faith in the agents and gave them their passbook. However, they were told that they lost their money because of their own negligence. The Shahs were also among the duped victims and they approached the postal department to get their money back. But credits of the amounts were shown in these accounts on the computer with the help of some postal department employees. The agents had fraudulently withdrawn money from the postal scheme accounts by closing them down. The CBI had conducted investigations into the scam amounting to over Rs 2 crore and also arrested two agents. However, some agents that the department had approved committed fraud worth crores of rupees and siphoned off the investors’ money from the postal schemes in 2010. The senior citizens had invested Rs 4 lakh in the monthly income scheme of the postal department a decade-and-half ago. Complainant Rajnikant Shah and his wife Vinoda had approached the consumer forum in 2011 after the postal department rejected their claim for refund of the money they had invested in postal schemes.
This was an order issued by the district consumer forum asking the postal department in Vadodara to return a complainant the money he had invested along with interest. VADODARA: If a government approved agent cheats investors, then the government agency is liable to refund the money invested to the customers.